Karen shares two different experiences about how her involvement was determined
Transcript
In this case, I had gone to a number of meetings and I had never got a sense of where this was going? What a tall part I would be playing. It just never got there. Like, it seems like, he was discussing his project and, stuff and, you were just sort of left sitting at the table. I kept thinking “Where is the point where you are inviting me to be part of this?” Whereas, in the first instance I went and, right away it was explained that I was part of this process. And, that we were going to, just what the issue was that they were looking at and, would be wanting to brainstorm around this issue to see if we could come up with a solution. And, they wanted to hear from me on, you know, how I could see that problem. Could I think of solutions? Or, what problems would I think that they, that a person would encounter?
So, right from the minute I stepped into the room, that opportunity was offered, you know. And, it was a learning process for me because I didn’t know much about what they wanted. So, it took me a little while, but they would put us in little groups for discussion. So, you were always a patient partner, a clinician, like, a doctor and, somebody on policy or, research, altogether in little groups. So, we would discuss these things that they were, questions they had put up there. And, then, we’d all come back and sort of report on that. And, it was quite lovely. Sometimes I reported back to the group and, sometimes, somebody else did. So, on that level too, if you were comfortable doing the report back to the group, they invited you to do that.
More from: Karen
More content
- Challenging Experiences – Karen
- Challenging Experiences – Karen (2)Karen describes an experience where she felt her involvement as a patient partner was tokenistic
- Supports needed – KarenA master class that Karen attended used great games to address the jargon.
- Diversity – KarenIf researchers came out to the community, Karen suggests, patients might feel more comfortable about getting involved
- Skills for partnership – KarenSpeaking clearly and making sure patients feel welcome is a key skill for researchers, says Karen.
- Relationship building – KarenKaren feels that patient partners should have a forum to share their illness experiences
- Role determination – KarenKaren shares two different experiences about how her involvement was determined
- Defining partnerships – KarenKaren prefers using the term ‘person of lived experience’ for patient partners
- Path to involvement – KarenThrough Karen’s patient advocacy work, she became interested and involved in research